[Teaching Problem Solving with AI] PL Reflection - AI Ethics

AI Foundations Teaching AI Foundations Learning Community
1

Choose one of the following questions to answer. Write an answer that reflects your personal position. Then, explain your reasoning, including what legal, ethical, or creative values guided your decision.

  • Who should own AI-generated content - the AI creator, the user, the company, or shared ownership? What happens if AI uses copyrighted material in training?
  • Should AI-generated art be considered “real art”? Who should get credit—the AI, the programmer, or the person providing the prompt?
  • Should musicians have control over AI trained on their music? Who should be compensated when AI-generated music is sold?

This discussion question is from the Self-Paced Professional Learning for Teaching Problem Solving with AI.

2

Who should own AI-generated content -

I will start off sharing I am in the Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO, camp of thinking for copyright, make it all open baby! I have been in education for almost 20 years and have always freely shared my creations, tutorials, and other material. I do this, so that possibly, an educator or student will find my work and be able to use it. I understand the importance of copyright though and the need to protect peoples hardwork. In the US though, the laws have just not kept up with the changes that are occurring. A serious discussion, with those who understand the new technology, being the main group, not those who are still amazed that you can cook an egg in a microwave.

1 Like
3

al utilizar la IA, los inforamcion deberia de ser libre, pero tambien se debe de respetar los trabajos de investigacion de autores que desean que todo su trabajo sea utilziado sin su consentimiento

4

Should AI-generated art be considered “real art”? Who should get credit—the AI, the programmer, or the person providing the prompt? I think that AI generated art should be put in a separate category of art that art that the artist had to come up with and design on their own. I believe this because it is one’s own thinking that allows them to be the creator vs giving prompts to a programmed AI that has been fed a lot of art from others. Yes one has to learn to give prompts to AI to get what they want, but the designs are not their own.

I designed an image for our schools Tech Club using AI and the image was amazing, but the design was that of others that I just prompted AI to curate and put together. I would not feel right to call it my own image.

5

I think the original creator of the music should retain the control and receive any royalties based on any AI derivations.