In the “for teachers only” section it says that “Oval B is around the swithPlayer function.” which looks like it should be "Oval C. Also regarding the explanation - I’m trying to figure out why answer “B” is not an acceptable answer since it does have one “child” (42-48) that includes mathematical and logical concepts.
Thank you for spotting those typos. They should be fixed as soon as possible.
The row 6 from the rubric requires 2 algorithms and 1 of them must have the math/logic. The point is not awarded if the code consists of solely library calls. I think that is why the first chunk, as written, cannot be counted as student developed which makes the 2nd chunk moot.