Is it just me, or is there no scoring incentive to answer written response 2b?
Written response 2b
2b. Describe your development process, explicitly identifying the computing tools and techniques you used to create your artifact. Your description must be detailed enough so that a person unfamiliar with those tools and techniques will understand your process.
Computational Artifact (and Written Response as needed)
1 Using Development Processes and Tools: The computational artifact identifies the computing innovation and provides an illustration,
representation, or explanation of the computing innovation’s intended purpose, function, or effect.
2 Analyzing Impact of Computing: States a plausible fact about the computing innovation’s intended purpose or function.
3 Analyzing Impact of Computing: Identifies at least ONE effect of the computing innovation.
4 Analyzing Impact of Computing: Identifies a beneficial effect AND a harmful effect of the computing innovation. Explains how ONE of the
identified effects impacts or has the potential to impact society, economy, or culture.
5 Analyzing Data and Information: Identifies the data that the computing innovation uses. Explains how that data is consumed, produced, OR
6 Analyzing Data and Information: Identifies one storage, privacy, OR security concern. Explains how the concern is related to the computing
7 Finding and Evaluating Information: Provides inline citations of at least 3 attributed sources within the written response. The citations must be
used to justify the response.
I don’t see anywhere where 2b is ever evaluated…